Comments on: Spiritual Warfare Movement https://www.theologicalsystems.com/movements-and-focuses/spiritual-warefare-movement/ David Cox Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:05:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Greg https://www.theologicalsystems.com/movements-and-focuses/spiritual-warefare-movement/#comment-93 Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:05:12 +0000 http://www.theologicalsystems.com/?page_id=219#comment-93 This is a great website!!
I’ve been a Christian all my life, and have faced almost all of these theological systems. It has driven me out of the organized church, which saddens me. However, many people are controlled and manipulated into all kinds of influence of weird theology, losing focus completely. Eventually, without fail, they realize they’ve been pretending for years. The propensity at that point is to reject Christianity altogether, rather than refocus on Christ. Of course, that is the goal of the enemy.

Please keep up the great work. It was your pages on Calvinism that brought me here in a Google search. I’m with on you rejecting all 5 points completely. I believe I’ve proved, to my way of thinking anyway, that Calvinism is pure pagan mysticism, that it morphed out of theocratic systems for the purpose of suppression of the individual and oppression of the people. Most people won’t go that far in their criticism, but you were spot on. Calvinism’s God is closer to Greek myths of the Nephilim – a hybrid human-god that plays games with the earth. A schizophrenic being that can’t figure out what he’s saying or trying to do.

If God’s word, in His call to the earth to come to him, is only true for the “elect”, then it is a lie to the non-elect, who cannot respond. It cannot be any other way. God is a liar. Either His word is true for all and always ture, or His word is a lie and He is not faithful.

Calvinists love to drop scripture bombs of multiple references that no one can respond to quickly. However, in every single case, in every single scripture they use, every single time without fail, the text of scripture does not say what they say it says. They MUST use inference and speculation to magically interpret it.

I’m going back to reading your articles…. have a great day 🙂

]]>