The Error of Calvinism

In the pages under this topic, I will mark the problems, abuses, error (heresy), and refutation of Calvinism. Over the years I have come to increasing see Calvinism taking the exact form of a cult, and this is very serious. In contrast to being the mark of fidelity, it is the mark of error. Although most people who are Calvinists simply won’t consider anything else as being true to God, please read my arguments against Calvinism and compare them with the reality of church life and the truth of God, and you will see in a Calvinist church, there are grave problems.

What’s your beef with Calvinism?

I grew up in a church that had a “good Calvinistic pastor”. I respected him greatly, and I truly think that he is saved. I am no judge, but I remember him going across state to visit the sick just to witness to them because they were in jeopardy of dying. Unfortunately, today, Calvinism has gone into a more advanced form where it is aggressively attacking true Christianity, and to even “offer the plan of salvation” is being attacked as “decisional regenerationism”, a horrible heresy in their eyes. While some aspects of Calvinism seem to fit with what the Scriptures teach, the hard-liners of today are taking things way far from any biblical norm that it must be denounced and attacked as a false cult. Ministers who are true to God and the Word of God have no other option here.

What I see as my major “beef” with Calvinism is a hell-bent desire to attack and destroy the very foundation of Christianity, true salvation.

The Schizophrenic Calvinist

Calvinism is truly a weird belief system. I have never studied any cult or false religion that is as strange as Calvinism. If you confront a Catholic, and he says that he doesn’t believe in the spiritual authority of the Pope and Roman, but he does go to a priest to confess, and he worships the Virgin Mary with images, and partakes of Mass, what would you say to him? “Well, you have separated yourself from a grave error of Catholicism, so you must be okay.” No. You would say, “Even though you have seen the true error of the Pope in Catholicism, and you have denounced that, you do not understand that it is all connected into a big ball of heresy, one thing depending on another, and one doctrine coming from another. Mary worship is asserted from the spiritual authority of Rome. Rome’s authority is associated with its particular doctrines and practices. The pope is a priest, just like every other Catholic priest, and he just sits at the top of pyramid, while the local priest is pretty much at the bottom.

You would insist with the Catholic that you must take the whole system, or reject the whole system, and a Catholic that holds to 7 of 10 principle doctrines of Catholicism is just as wrong as a 10 pointer.

But when you come to Calvinism, this identification with error coming from John Calvin apparently makes no impression on Calvinists. I rarely find hard liner Calvinists (5 pointers), and the vast majority of Calvinists hold to something less than the full 5 points of Calvinism.

So you know where I am coming from, I denounce all 5 points and a lot more in Calvinism. Calvinism uses a bate and switch method, proclaiming one thing, and then redefining that to suit them, and if anybody attacks one of the 5 points of the Tulip (like Total Depravity), all of a sudden we drop total inability, and we are back to talking about no merit in the individual. This is a very sutle deceptive trick of Calvinists, and if you examine what they actually teach on each of the 5 points, a true biblical Christian CANNOT ACCEPT ANY OF THE FIVE FUNDAMENTAL DOCTRINES OF CALVINISM.

What really has surprised me over the years is to look into the ministries and lives of preachers and pastors who are Calvinists. I really think some of them are truly saved (not the die-hard ones though), and they know in their heart and the Holy Spirit working in their conscience what they should be doing (what is God’s will), but they wrestle with their Calvinism and the logical conclusions of that thought processes (where the strong current of calvinistic thought drags them to) and what the Bible truly teaches.

What this produces in them is a kind of schizophrenia where logically their Calvinist teachings and foundations would lead them to give up any kind of effort towards true evangelism, true prayer, true exhortation, or true biblical missions. They know what the Bible teaches and they just cannot go (in their heart) where Calvinism is leading them because their soul begs the truth upon them. They pray, they witness, and they preach, but they don’t know what is the foundation of truth, or what they are any more, and they fight within themselves over where is the Bible’s true line. This is manifested by endless debates between Calvinists over these topics, but in the end, it is simply a confrontation process of truth against the Calvinist error.

The entire Calvinist system drags people away from the truth of Scripture, and even though we can debate all this and never get to any definitive conclusion, I would appeal to Christ and the apostles. Christ witnessed to many a person, presenting himself as the key to eternal life, and ALWAYS the issue is pressed by Christ upon the human sinner, repent (change), and believe in the Messiah. Somehow today in modern Calvinism, that is a great heresy. How? Being like Christ is wrong? This shows you the truth of God against the black heresy of Calvinism. Calvinism drags people into a form of life, conduct, and doctrine that is not Christ-like.

All the Marks of a Cult and Heresy

One of the strong marks of a cult is the way in which they handle Scripture, the way in which they think, and the kind of reasoning that they use. Calvinism is very adapt at twisting, turning, and redefining concepts and biblical words to suit their teaching and doctrines. When the Jehovah’s Witness twists and turns the word “God” in John 1 to make it mean anything but the true and singular real God of heaven, we all attack them for twisting the obvious and most common sense of Scripture to mean something that obviously it doesn’t mean. They (the Jehovah’s Witnesses) themselves denounce a plurality of gods as unbiblical, and yet they propose that God the Father (Jehovah) is somehow different in essence that Jesus, which they denominate “the son of God” as being inferior to Jehovah. This kind of twisting and turning we reject with the cults. So why is it now acceptable when the Calvinist does it?

I have read arguments on why the word “all” doesn’t mean all when it refers to Christ dying for all the world. Salvation for the Calvinist is not for everybody, it is only for the elect.

In the studies below, I will slowly go through as many of these problem areas of Calvinism as time and my energy permit.

Studies on Refuting Calvinism

I will gradually add more pages to these as I deal with different aspects of Calvinism.

3 Responses to The Error of Calvinism

  1. Khris says:

    Both Calvinism and Armenianism have a one sided view of the doctrine of election which all their teachings are based on. We should teach election to believers not enquirers and always preach Christ. The statements above however does not give a proper refutation of Calvinism. (It looks like it addresses HyperCalvinism). There is no counter argument to the so called 5 points.

    • admin says:

      The problem is that Calvinism redefines and changes Scripture’s teaching. I refute the 5 points of Calvinism in other articles, and this one did not have that purpose. I would like for you to comment and defend your statement, about Hypercalvinism. Tell me where is the line between Hypercalvinism and calvinism. I cannot see any difference. I deal with Roman Catholics and Jehovah’s Witnesses all the time, and when a Roman Catholic tells me that they don’t believe the pope is the victor of Christ, or that they don’t worship images, but they still go to the Catholic church, I don’t create a hyperCatholic and a Catholic, and say they are just Catholics, not HyperCatholics. When they go to Mass every Sunday, they are Catholics. It does not matter if they personally refute one or two of the basic Catholic beliefs or practices. Most Catholics have something in their religion that they don’t like and don’t follow. They are still Catholics.

      So if you are going to tell me that you can be a Calvinist (good in your sight) and not go to the extremes of hypercalvinism (which is a concept Calvinists dreamt up to hook some that still have problems with obvious Calvinist pillars of doctrine) then I cannot see where you are in any good position. The bottom line is that Calvinism is a false religion. What is your view on election? That it decides whether we are saved or not? This is a false concept according to the Bible. The Bible ALWAYS presents the key to being saved or not is YOUR faith in Jesus Christ as your Savior, and it doesn’t present that what decides if we are saved or not is election. God offers salvation to us on the basis of his plan. Election is a term that refers to the saved, and it means just as much that we are special, as how we were saved. The point is that nowhere in the Bible is our salvation decided without our participation. God chose for purposes and uses, and this is always true of election (or choosing), but this purposes and uses are not always talking about our eternal destiny, but how we fit into the plan of God here on earth.

      The bottom line is if it smells like a fish, and looks like a fish, and tastes like a fish, it is a fish. That is a good guide in life. People who see the saved as getting that way only because God had a divine lottery, and their ticket won, these people are Calvinist. My Bible says that whosoever believes will be saved. The promise of God has no reference to election or this divine lottery, so it is a heresy invented by Calvinists to discourage Christians from witnessing, winning the lost, and praying, and to discourage the unsaved that they have no possibility of being saved. These are lies from hell, and they are given life here in people through Calvinism.

  2. jgar says:

    Classic 5 point Calvinism” states the following doctrinal beliefs, and uses the helpful acrostic (T-U-L-I-P) to remember them: T=Total Depravity of man; U=Unconditional election; L=Limited Atonement; I=Irresistible grace; P=Perseverance of the Saints. In this case, if classic Calvinism is correct, then the ‘I’ in particular leads to the inexorable conclusion that God creates most to send them to hell. If an individual cannot resist God’s grace (the ‘I’), and God elects only a few to salvation (Matt. 7:13-14), then clearly he elects most to damnation without their ever having a chance to make a genuine choice. This is tight logic with no room for equivocation and the non-contradictory Calvinist is forced to admit this. In addition, the ‘L’ (limited atonement, meaning that Jesus only died for those who are actually saved, and not for all people of all times) is shown to be false by many scripture, not the least of which are John 3:16, or 1 John 2:2.

    Due to the fact that the classic 5 point Calvinist position leads to the conclusion that God purposely creates people knowing they will have no choice in avoiding hell (only give/direct His ‘irresistible grace’ to very few), I reject this position since the teachings in the scripture regarding His mercy would contradict this conclusion (Deut. 4:31; Jer. 3:12). It is true that all who pass the age of accountability deserve to go to hell, for all are born in sin and all freely choose to sin and thereby ratify their position as Adam’s rebellious descendants. However, if those who pass the age of accountability are not given the ability to respond to God’s mercy in order to be saved, then the unavoidable conclusion is that God continues to create the vast majority of people knowing they will have no choice but to be condemned to hell, since He will not direct His “irresistible grace” on them (a concept not taught in scripture). This conclusion leads to impugning the three most important characteristics (from man’s perspective at least) of God’s character – His love, mercy and forgiveness. In addition, scripture contradicts this position (2 Pet. 3:9; 1 Tim. 2:3-4). The Calvinistic notion that Adam’s sin is to blame for our inability to be able to respond to God’s mercy is inconsistent with scripture (Ezekiel 18 et al). Adam’s sin affects all who are born after him and gives them a predisposition of pride and unbelief which deserves God’s just condemnation, but God’s abundant compassion makes a Way for all who will choose to respond to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Donate to Support this Ministry!

Mountain View

Donate to Pastor David Cox to support this website ministry via Paypal. It is only through people like you who stand for good doctrine that we are able to keep this website up proclaiming the truth. Be a part of it!

If you don't have paypal, Use the "donate" button in the footnote. It allows you to use your credit card or debit card securely through Paypal's security system, but not having to have a Paypal account. Look below the "Paypal" button on the next screen after you click the link, and click "Use Credit or Debit Card" Write me if you have questions. [email protected]