Burks, R. – Damaged Disciples

Damaged Disciples: Casualties of Authoritarian Churches and the Shepherding Movement, Ron and Vicki Burks, 1992. Ron was taught to subject himself totally to his disciplers in the shepherding movement. Vicki was taught to submit to her husband. This is their story of struggling to break free and rebuild their lives. For Vicki, it is the story of rescuing her “self” from non-being. Ron later earned his PhD. in counseling and was on staff at Wellspring. Here is his dissertation, Cognitive Impairment In Thought Reform Environments.



Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Burks, R. – Damaged Disciples

Recovering from Churches that abuse Exiting #4

Comments on Recovering from Churches that abuse Exiting #4

Comments on Recovering from Churches that abuse #4 I Comment on Chapter 2 Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Churches that abuse Exiting them.

Commentary about Enroth, R. – Recovering from Churches that Abuse



Continue reading

Posted in Abusive Churches | Tagged | Comments Off on Recovering from Churches that abuse Exiting #4

Cloud-Townsend – Boundaries When to say yes when to say no

Boundaries: When To Say Yes, When to Say No to Take Control of Your Life, Dr. Henry Cloud &s Dr. John Townsend, 1992. The Assembly system intentionally militated to break down normal boundaries in peoples lives. The concepts and examples in this book are extremely helpful to recognize where the issues lie and change course. There is an accompanying workbook.



Continue reading

Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Cloud-Townsend – Boundaries When to say yes when to say no

Martin, P.R. – Cult Proofing your Kids

Cult Proofing Your Kids, Paul R. Martin, 1993.  Whether or not you are comfortable with the “cult” word, this book includes a lot of information that is very helpful to people from the Assembly, especially the chapters on the healthy family, parenting tips, developing critical thinking, changing family dynamics and a “cult susceptibility” questionnaire. click more for more on Cult Proofing your Kids



Continue reading

Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Martin, P.R. – Cult Proofing your Kids

Arterburn, S. – Faith that Hurts, Faith that Heals

Faith that Hurts, Faith that Heals

By S. Arterburn and J. Felton

Faith That Hurts, Faith That Heals, Steve Arterburn and Jack Felton, 1992 [originally published as Toxic Faith]. Details the process by which true faith disintegrates into a harmful belief system and even religious addiction, and outlines 17 characteristics of healthy faith. Faith that Hurts, Faith that Heals



Continue reading

Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Arterburn, S. – Faith that Hurts, Faith that Heals

Enroth, R. – Recovering from Churches that Abuse

Recovering From Churches That Abuse, Dr. Ronald Enroth, 1994. The message of this book is that “mending” is possible. He makes the point that as the damage was relational, the healing must also be relational. Again Dr. Enroth devotes a chapter to the Assembly. One very helpful aspect of both of Dr. Enroth’s books is seeing similarities between the Assembly and other hurtful Christian groups. Recovering from Churches that Abuse is now available online in PDF format.



Continue reading

Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Enroth, R. – Recovering from Churches that Abuse

Tucker, R.A. – Another Gospel

Another Gospel



Continue reading

Posted in Spirit Abuse Reference | Tagged | Comments Off on Tucker, R.A. – Another Gospel

Brainwashing in Abusive Churches

Ads

Introduction

I would like to introduce this topic by presenting a counter-topic, how do we transmit or transfer morality (that supposedly we have accumulated through our spiritual life) to other? Be they our own kids, or family and friends, or just common people in our church? There should be some kind of standardized way this happens, and basically, it consists of our teaching the principles, then practicing that morality ourselves in our own lives, and then “helping” other people by guiding them in making decisions and setting good moral practices in their own lives.

While we can agree that this is really the way it should go, we get so “gun shy” about abusive churches that many people go off into a never try to morally teach other people anything because you might become abusive position. We need to train the upcoming generation what they need to know to do the work of God correctly. One needs to get over the “gun shy” attitude of not wanting to get involved in other people’s lives morally. You have to do it.



Victims of such brainwashing have lost their personal autonomy and in some cases are reduced to almost a zombie-like state!  A person who goes to their church Sunday after Sunday, and hears basically the same underlying message repeatedly for a lifetime, has little hope of ever understanding TRUTH as it is revealed in all of the Scriptures.
 
But these people will refuse to learn anything different from what they have been indoctrinated in.  Why is that?
The reasons are simple but very important to be aware of and understand — BRAINWASHING and FEAR.

I think the best way to guide us so that we don’t go off into a cult-like practice is simply to consider what a good parent would do for their child. A good parent doesn’t want to make all the decisions for their children but wants them “to grow up” and mature so that they can make good decisions on their own.



When I and my wife die, our two children should be able to function in life by themselves, or by themselves with their spouse. Maturity or being grown up is measured by the following (and maybe more I am not mentioning), but these are essential in my thinking:

(1) They work and support themselves.
(2) Whatever problems they have, they work out themselves.
(3) Whatever problems they cannot solve, they go somewhere to somebody more expert than they are, and they get help.
(4) They teach their children what is morally right (no lying, cheating, stealing, killing, etc.).
(5) They personally practice what they morally teach.
(6) They are able to take criticism from others, rationally consider it, and modify their own life if they are wrong.
(7) Whatever is lacking or wrong, they are able to recognize it and work on fixing it.
etc.

Eph 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; Eph 4:12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

The purpose behind God giving the gift of pastor-teacher is to that the saints will be equipped to do the work of the ministry themselves, i.e. that they be perfect Christians, not perfectly sinless, but mature Christians that are able to function on their own.

As a pastor, I am not to do the work of the ministry for my church and people, but my job is to equip or capacitate THEM to do it. Pastors reproduce pastors, and sheep reproduce sheep. Like a sheep, I should witness to others and “reproduce”. But the church as a whole has that same directive. and they should be the principal ones winning souls to Christ and encouraging new converts to stay the course in the way of Christ.

Brainwashing:  
1) any method of controlled systematic indoctrination, especially one based on repetition or confusion;
2) inducing a person to modify their beliefs, attitudes, or behavior by conditioning through various forms of pressure;
3) the ability to apply procedures or methods so as to effect a radical change in the ideas and beliefs of a person.

Now consider why really morality transfer as the Bible presents it and brainwashing are different. “We” (good churches and leaders) indoctrinate our people with the truth of Scripture. That is a major contrast. But “everybody” says that, good and bad churches. How to tell the difference?

I think the difference can be discerned because what we should be doing is to indoctrinate our people with Scripture, correctly interpreted, and abundantly displayed by our own lives and practice. When we live the moral principles we teach, then that is a key. Also, it is extremely important to correctly interpret Scripture, and that forms the core teaching of what we use to indoctrinate our people. It HAS TO BE SCRIPTURE!



When I take a Jehovah’s Witness or Roman Catholic that has accepted the Lord “under my wing” and teach that person, there should be a radical change in doctrine, belief, and practice. Nothing else can be right.

When a leader or church indoctrinates people to their views that are “loosely” based on Scripture (no thorough exposition of the principles that they are trying to teach is used as a rule), then the group is abusive.

The difference between brainwashing and good Bible teaching is that the brainwasher uses repetition of arguments and catchphrases, and a good Bible teacher exposits Scripture and applies it opportunely as the highways and byways of life present opportunity. Brainwashers want to hobby horse the same points instead of giving a breath of teaching across Scripture. Also, expositors work the entire whole of Scripture, and they do not focus on only the parts that are convenient for them, for example, obey those who are over you is beaten a lot, but the requirements for a man of God hardly ever.

These comments come from reading an article http://www.wickedshepherds.com/BRAINWASHING.html

Posted in Brainwashing | Tagged , | Comments Off on Brainwashing in Abusive Churches

Signs of Abusive leadership #2

Ads

1.  Idolatry – Create excessive, and sometimes blind, admiration and devotion to a person or group, and their beliefs.

I think that the point here is that abusive, wicked, or false leaders want others to adore them. This comes from walking with Satan, which wanted even Christ to adore him. The key element that a good leader always remembers is that he is a sinful man like all other men, and he is not so great or better than other people. A good leader looks at leadership as service, and as Christ came to service, so a good leader enters a church to serve God by serving the people. This concept totally controls him.

A bad leader sees himself as being great, and his church has the great advantage of being in his presence and serving him, his desires, and his goals. He uses the church and its members as stepping stones to his own greatness. The difference in attitude is tremendous, and is like night and day.

2.  There is a well developed, and often unstated system of rules and codes for behavior.  Teaching God will approve of the members who follow the leader and are loyal to him is of utmost importance.  God is not acting out of grace or mercy.  God is a strict judge of justice who is working directly with and through the leaders who alone know what God really wants.  The Mind Controller becomes their parent, and his followers are treated like children.  They do not need to know everything, but just what the leaders think they need to know.

I think the key element here is that an abusive leader makes rules and a “system” for his followers to be “in” or “out” of his graces, and he works that system extensively. Our obedience is not to men, but to God. As a man of God dedicates himself to God and obeys God, God blesses that man, and others should follow him. As a minister strays from that commitment to God and his standards and work, others should leave him to himself.

The system is a very definite mark that something is wrong. A good leader of a church is pastor-like, and that means that he relates to all the members of his church. He has a personal relationship with each and everyone, no matter if they participate in his “system” of favorites or not.

3.  Almost total dependence on a leader, leaders, and the group, combined with cutting off most of the outside world; especially close friends and relatives.

Here I think we see the great difference between a true church with good leaders and a cult. A cult wants to drag people into the group and then cut them off from interaction with others, especially family and other Christians in other churches that can/could give them feedback as far as what is happening in their church.

When a group considers itself the only true church, they are wrong. They are a cult. “Yes, there are others that are kind of like us, but really we are the only ones that are 100% right.” The cult thinking is to cut off rational thinking and reasonableness. They are pushing their members towards being extremists, while a good church is pushing their members towards being a balanced, reasonable Christian.



4.  Systematically using subtle techniques for changing the way people think, what they think, and keep existing member’s thoughts and hearts loyal to the Mind Controller and his cause.  The goal is to have the Mind Controller as the parent, and the adult subjects functioning as his children.

Actually, to be truthful, probably the best expositor and thinker in any church is the pastor. Some exceptions might exist, but basically, that is the way things work. If there is somebody who is a better student of Scripture, they have to be very humble to work with the pastor (and the pastor has to be humble also to take advantage of his knowledge and wisdom).

Usually, our egos overtake us, and leaders rarely can handle rebuke from subordinates, and to be corrected on Scripture is deadly. If a major issue comes up and somebody else corrects the pastor, either the pastor leaves or that person is runoff. This is because of egos.

If you examine Acts 15, the early church functioned with many godly endowed men of God (the twelve apostles, the 120 disciples, Paul and Barnabas, etc.). But they were able to challenge each other and correct incorrect understanding and practice, dealing with doctrine in the process. Few church leaders today can pass through such an experience, and rarely any would actually desire that kind of multiple inputs of voices in major issues. That just shows us how far we have gotten from biblical New Testament churches.

5.  Teaching that the group has all the answers; it has everything good in life and there is nothing else.

I think I touched on this above, but the idea that each church is an island, and the only island out there of true, biblical doctrine and practice is very common among churches, and much more so among abusive churches. The dependence of one church on others is rarely worked out correctly.



Note that the idea is that the views and ideas of other Christians (leaders and laymen) is important and balancing to our view and ideas doesn’t happen often. Either things go the way of a convention or denomination, and in that case, a few decide the doctrine and practice and the rest receive it, or nobody listens to anybody else. Either way it is wrong and not New Testament Christianity.

6.  Creating an environment of fear in leaving.  Any deserters are punished by shunning, and are vilified and marginalized by ridicule before and/or after they leave. This creates a profoundly deep subconscious fear in the existing members to never leave, so this won’t happen to them.  Anything outside of the group is inferior and of Satan.  It is evil.  There is no rule or doctrine more pure, or better, than the group’s.  Outside is failure and disaster.

Here we see the conclusion of this island thinking. To leave the group is the same as to abandon Christ and declare one’s self a Satan worshipper. That is even if you go to another church of the same doctrine and practice as your church.

That is the problem, churches don’t work in the context of world Christianity, but just their own corner of it, and they blow that up to be the last bastion of the faith on earth, that kind of thinking.

This commentary is taken from the article, Mind Control: Six tell-tale signs of abusive church leaders at http://www.wickedshepherds.com/MindControl.html

Posted in Abusive Churches | Tagged , | Comments Off on Signs of Abusive leadership #2

Enroth, R. – Churches that Abuse

Churches that Abuse Continue reading

Posted in Spiritual Abuse-Cults | Tagged | Comments Off on Enroth, R. – Churches that Abuse